a spoiler-filled entry
In one of this somber film's more comedic moments, the Joker looks into the face of his nemesis and declares, "You complete me." The criminal's words obviously have nothing to do with the kind of sentimental love story from which he wrested them (Cameron Crowe's Jerry Maguire), and much to do with the violent dance in which these two enemies find themselves. It is a premise the Joker later elaborates while hanging upside down at Batman's mercy, explaining that Batman's apparent unwillingness to kill means the two adversaries' conflict will play itself out indefinitely. Batman, the Joker muses, is the incorruptible foil for his own chaos-bringing, death-delivering self. No matter whom he kills or corrupts, the Joker's fun will never encounter more than a temporary lull because Batman represents a moral standard more committed to justice than Newton's Third Law of Motion.
The Joker's words forward an ageless idea, that good and evil--here manifest as a devotion to order and a celebration of anarchy--are equal opposites. Taken to its extreme, such moral dualism suggests that the most malevolent action is motivated by purely evil intent, and that goodness simply replicates itself.
At first glance, the villain of Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight (2008) seems to be what he claims, someone committed to chaos for chaos' sake. He has no apparent friends, family, or loved ones for whose sake he commits his acts of theft and destruction, and even his coworkers in crime regularly receive a bullet to the head or some much more horrible end for their efforts. He kills government figures, destroys hospitals, and even burns mountains of money in his possession for no other reason than to shake the sociopolitical foundations of Gotham. And, to further bewilder those individuals horrified by his strange appearance and stranger actions, he spins numerous, mutually exclusive origin stories to explain the scars on his face and the flashing knives in his hands.
Batman's selfless, self-sacrificing actions throughout the film (particularly at its close), neatly foil his foe's actions, completing the Joker's proposed portrait of two discrete, dueling forces locked in endless struggle.
There is, however, the small but significant matter of the Joker's infamous laugh, an ingredient which ruins his own recipe. If the Joker were truly the polar opposite of our brooding hero, he would take no delight in his own actions . . .
It's not enough for the Joker to be an enigma with incomprehensible impulses, someone whose drive towards chaos is the antithesis of Batman's desire to protect and preserve. The Joker's laughter signals his familiarity with what is a God-given, intrinsic good--delight. That he and Batman each derive pleasure from dramatically different courses of action does not erase the fact that this same principle motivates them. As C. S. Lewis explains in Mere Christianity (1943, 1945), "badness is only spoiled goodness," "a parasite, not an original thing." Evil may possess its own distinct modus operandi, but it lacks a set of motivators to set those actions in motion, and must borrow and bastardize those created by a righteous God. People sin, in other words, to gain what is inherently good, they just pursue that good at the wrong time, to the wrong degree, or for the wrong reason. Sexual arousal, comradery, happiness, emotional security, and any number of other enjoyable experiences in this life only become immoral when pursued at the cost of relationship with the Lord and with others.
Last year's No Country for Old Men introduced us to a cold killer so emotionally detached from his actions and those around him that he came across more as a force of Nature (in the Tennysonian, "red in tooth and claw" sense) than an actual human. By contrast, the Joker's delirious delight in destruction makes him less a riddle than he wishes to be, opening a crack in that mad mask he hopes will repel others' thoughtful gaze. Knowing that he can laugh suggests he has a heart that can be made glad and, perhaps, sad.
This most recent iteration of Batman's greatest foe may not be very sympathetic, but the glee implicit in the psychopath's smile suggests that he might just be human after all.
Posted by Paul Marchbanks at July 20, 2008 11:48 PM
Sincerely, this is the best analysis I've read in a long time. I agree with you in everything you postulate here except perhaps in the matter of the joker's laugh. Yes, he should not take any delight in his actions, but there is always the thing that, no matter how deep we think about it, the Joker is, well, insane. He's a sociopath, he doesn't adjust to social canons so its perfectly logical for him to feel pleasure out of the chaos he delivers to the world. On the other hand the selflessness of Batman is just like the selflessness of a saint; in a way, they do get delight out of their good actions. Only that it is a more controlled delight, the kind of feeling you get at the end of a day knowing you did the right thing.
Posted by: Mike at July 30, 2008 3:02 AM
the joker is so awesome, he is so hot, and he is my idol!
Posted by: brittany at August 9, 2008 10:55 PM