July 3, 2006

Superman Returns: Salvation in Tights

By Paul Marchbanks

Recent Entries in Action

Earlier this week, I watched a favorite from my early childhood, Superman (1978). It had aged pretty well, particularly the first forty-five minutes, and I was unembarrassed as I recalled how my youthful fascination with the character had resulted in a box full of collectable movie cards, a prized Superman mug still living in my parents’ cupboard, and a favorite birthday party complete with hand-crafted Superman logo and an action figure bursting out of a homemade cake.

As I noted in a Paste blurb a couple years ago, I soon relegated the sole survivor of Krypton to my personal past. Oh, I enjoyed watching Superman II (1980) repeatedly on VHS during middle school (Star Trek II was another oft-viewed sequel), but I never collected the comics, played with the figures, or became addicted to the Super Friends cartoon like some of my peers.

Despite his accepted iconic status in American culture, Superman has been disregarded by many adults for being too far-fetched because too multi-powered, too invulnerable, and just too darn virtuous. Over the last couple decades, Batman comics have made much of the great temperamental difference separating these sometime colleagues, and much of comicdom has followed suit. If we’re going to imaginatively walk alongside a superhero, we’d prefer a dark, haunted man in tights to one who represents “truth, justice, and all that stuff.”

While watching Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns (2006) on the IMAX screen, however, I realized that Superman remains a powerful symbol for the lovers of this genre not because we can relate to him but precisely because we cannot. Unlike most other superheroes in the DC and Marvel universes, this God-like champion may dodge our sympathy, but he never eludes our respect. His active devotion to justice for everyone is more than human, his courage unwavering, and his willingness to sacrifice himself to save the world echoes that of Christ.

Of the various elements culled from the first two films, Singer does the most with this last one. He does recreate the traditional character and costume, faithfully adopt the original set designs of the Fortress of Solitude and Daily Planet, insert many dialogic and narratological nods to the first couple flicks, and encourage his composer to employ John William’s amazing score from the 70’s. But what I most enjoyed was this film’s suggestion that humanity is in deep need of help—that we don’t possess the tools and virtues to perfect our own lives, let alone anyone else’s.

Richard Donner’s first Superman film purposefully employed a lot of Biblical language in setting up the relationship between the father “Jor-El,” his only son “Kal-El,” and those on Earth who would benefit from the son’s presence. (Watch Act 1 of the film again—you may be surprised at the sheer abundance of examples.) Singer’s film makes the Christological allusions still more unavoidable. In a moment captured nicely by the trailer, Lois Lane tells her former lover that the world does not need a savior, and that they definitely don’t need him. A few minutes later, Superman lifts her into the nighttime sky and shows her Metropolis as he sees it, noting that every night he hears many voices crying out for saving.

The Christian allegory is not perfect, of course. Without ruining the story, let me just say that while Superman’s sacrificial actions later on strengthen the parallel, a few other key events explode it.

But I don’t mind. Anything that reminds this fallible, sinful race of our unavoidable imperfections and dire need for transcendent help is gold in my book.

Posted by Paul Marchbanks at July 3, 2006 10:02 AM

Comments

I suppose the most sensitive thread of the movie, to my heart, was that Superman's son had asthma. I, too, have a son with asthma. While he was growing up, I was especially sensitive to his health, when it was challenged by overnighters with friends, and junk food. It seemed he would always return home congested, perhaps sick. But, God. Even as Superman's son was given special powers, my son became strong, in spite of his health. God gave him a sensitive heart toward people, and a determination to excel in all he did: in class, in music, and swimming. But isn't that the way God works? When we are weak, He is strong.

Posted by: Terry at July 18, 2006 8:50 PM

Agreed! Singer really took the allusions to Christ to another level. Our difference in generation changes our views a bit, as I am a Smallville fan and Superman is more of a figure who can be identified with for me. At times, everyone feels different and everyone feels a certain disconnect or uniqueness not felt by anyone else. Clark's relationship with Lois still gives us this trait that many can identify with, but Singer finds it more important (and I'm not disputing this) to emphasize how different he truly is (i.e. how he is a savior to the world). Quite interesting really...but I wish the editors would have cut out a solid 10-15 minutes of the film. The flashback to childhood scene was extraneous and the film clearly ran long in spots. Not to be negative, I think Singer's film took some great strides forward and I am excited about the opportunity for him to make the sequel.

Posted by: Devin Conroy at November 5, 2006 4:55 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)