January 5, 2006

The Ringer: Let the Games Begin!

By Guest Student Writer

Recent Entries in Comedy

Walking into the theatre, popcorn in hand, I did not expect to leave with anything more than my purse and keys. Making my way to the top of the theatre, I was surprised to see Charlie Davis, sitting alone at the end of the aisle. Brother to my former volleyball teammate and moderately handicapped, I stopped to chat and discovered he graduated from high school to work two minimum wage jobs. This chance encounter allowed me to view the film with a modified perspective, helping me conclude that, unlike some of Hollywood’s previous, failed attempts to portray the mentally challenged as more than a joke, director Barry Blaustein’s The Ringer (2005) does successfully underscore these character’s humanity.

Blaustein’s underlying current of sarcasm and irony ironically helps the viewers recognize the humanity in the film’s intellectually challenged characters. By employing comedic elements, he encourages his audience to look beyond a medical diagnosis in determining character. When able-minded businessman Steve Barker (Johnny Knoxville) successfully enters the Special Olympics as Jimmy Dahmor, he demonstrates that society instinctively categorizes individuals based on stereotypes grounded in mere appearances.

Steve Barker’s play-acting at being mentally challenged provides both himself and the audience with a VIP access to several real-life special athletes, helping us to break down our own prejudices that would regard the intellectually disabled individual as simply “other.” When the special athletes engage in negative behaviors, such as practical jokes, they remind us of our own imperfections and intolerant tendencies. The audience is encouraged to identify with the intellectually challenged individuals’ locker room mischief and pursuit of companionship. And six-time gold medalist Jimmy Washington (Leonard Flowers) introduces the viewers to a hierarchy within the challenged community: surprisingly, he appears at the games in a limousine, surrounded by bodyguards.

Periodically glancing over at Charlie and seeing him laugh out loud, I knew that this film was successfully sending its message that the mentally challenged are not so different than the rest of us. Although Blaustein took a risk in incorporating several challenged athletes’ crude humor and sexual innuendos, his overall message rang clear: it is often times our common misconceptions of the intellectually challenged which serve as a basis of our immediate dismissal of and inability to accept them as functioning individuals in our society.

By Jennifer Rimbach (UNC-CH)

Posted by Guest Student Writer at January 5, 2006 9:43 AM

Comments

I have not seen this film. However, I have heard and read several reviews—including one on the Special Olympics website
—that support this film as one that uses humor to help people see beyond differences. Having heard at least three positive reviews that included the voices of the disabled, I would probably (at least initially) view the film and humor differently than you did—a case in which our presuppositions about a film have a great impact on our responses.

Posted by: Tracey Marchbanks at December 30, 2005 2:38 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)