August 15, 2005

Million Dollar Baby: Actions Speak Louder

By Rhett Davis

Recent Entries in Drama

<a spoiler-filled review

Not that I am (I think) in much danger of ceasing to believe in God. The real danger is of coming to believe such dreadful things about Him. The conclusion I dread is not, "So there's no God after all," but "So this is what God's really like. Deceive yourself no longer.” (from C.S.Lewis’s A Grief Observed)

Clint Eastwood’s Million Dollar Baby (2004) is an excellent movie, primarily because of its characterizations. Eastwood portrays Frankie, the boxing manager who begins the movie as a hard-hearted, mean-spirited curmudgeon, and who makes an astounding transformation into a soft soul whose kind-hearted smile makes your heart want to break. The catalyst for this transformation is Maggie (played by Hillary Swank), the new kid whose indefatigable spirit convinces Frankie that she has the potential to be a world-class fighter. Morgan Freeman and the largely unsung Margo Martindale also give excellent performances. What really made me love this movie, though, was how it forced me to think about an issue now facing the Christian church. It’s difficult to discuss without giving away the ending, so please don’t read on if you haven’t seen it yet.

As a Christian, the aspect of this movie that fascinated me the most was how ineffectual the movie’s main religious character was. Throughout the movie, Frankie attends his local church and relishes verbally sparring with the priest, Father Horvak (played by Brian O’Byrne). Father Horvak recognizes that he’s being toyed with, and he moans and groans through the encounters with a “don’t you get it?” kind of condescending demeanor. But after Maggie is crippled in her last fight and asks Frankie to assist her in suicide, Frankie turns to Father Horvak for real guidance. What we hear from Father Horvak is not a message of God’s love, but simply “If you do this thing, you will regret it.” This is not enough to deter Frankie, who administers a lethal injection to Maggie and then disappears, never setting foot in his own gym again, and as Morgan Freeman’s final narration tells us, hopefully finding some measure of peace in his final days, presumably without God’s presence to comfort him. This paradox is a very difficult one for Christians to handle, and we may be tempted to write the movie off as “anti-Christian”. But I think that it bears more consideration.

One of the most serious indictments of the modern Christian church, in my opinion, is the fact that we generally lead with our objections, rather than by our example. Father Horvak illustrates how ineffective this tack is. It’s not enough to say, “Don’t do it, you’ll be sorry,” without offering a point of view that is more loving than the contrary.

Christian groups voice their objections constantly though the media. One of the most vocal is the anti-abortion “Right to Life” camp. But simply saying “no” to abortion does not solve the problems of the people who have unwanted children. Neither is it enough to simply say “yes” to abortion, as evidenced by the situation in Russia, where there are now two abortions for every one successful birth. Another Christian Right-to-life value system would make it illegal to withhold care from brain-dead patients. In the well-publicized case of Terry Schiavo’s death, House Majority Leader Tom Delay attacked what he called “an arrogant, out of control, unaccountable judiciary”, pledging to make them “answer for their behavior.”

But to continue to state these objections without offering loving solutions causes us to lose sight of the life God wants for us. What should a mother do who feels that she cannot support a child and believes that the child will be severely retarded? How many more decades should Terry Schiavo’s husband have endured, hoping that his wife would recover? And what would we do in Frankie’s case, in Million Dollar Baby? My reaction to the blanket Christian “no” to these cases is similar to C. S. Lewis’ reaction to his wife’s death, as represented by the quote above. I don’t believe that God desires that kind of misery for us. One of Jesus’ teachings was to cast off legalism in our understanding of right and wrong. Throughout the gospels, Jesus sparred with the Pharisees, denouncing them at one point as “hypocrites” and a “brood of vipers” (Matthew 23) for blindly quoting God’s law without looking for the deeper message of love. I fear that to blindly denounce the assisted suicide in Million Dollar Baby would make me no better than a Pharisee.

So, what would I do, if I were Frankie? I would feel compelled to do everything I could to keep Maggie’s spirit alive. But I’m not sure what I would do after months of trying with no success. I certainly don’t think that God intended for us to live like Maggie, unable to even breathe without machinery, losing limbs to bed-sores. To what degree should we trust in ourselves and keep people alive through our artifice, rather than trust in God and let them die the death that seems meant to be?

In the end, I don’t think I’d ever be able to judge the situation unless I was the one living it. And whichever decision I made, I would pray to God every day that it was the right one. As for now, I’ll thank Him that my loved ones have remained safe and healthy yet another day.

Posted by Rhett Davis at August 15, 2005 9:13 PM

Comments

Could you elaborate on what you mean by "a dialogue" itself meriting salvation?

Posted by: Paul Marchbanks at August 25, 2005 1:14 PM

This is a compassionate, articulate review, but it falls prey to one off the ills it decries, namely, the tendency of Christians to fall into finger-wagging. In this

case, the reviewer wags his finger at Christians who wag fingers.

Let us consider two things we know about Christ. First, we know that he had a deep compassion for those suffering around him, giving warmth to those abandoned in the cold

of their own sin. Second, we know that he called sinners to repent and follow him, and he did not hide his wrath from those who refused to listen. But how did he know who

needed which message? That which is hidden in our hearts is only for God to know, and that is why Jesus has the authority that he has. It is an authority that no other

human being can come close to having.

Yet Christ does not let us off the hook. He commands us to imitate him, both in his compassion and in his call to sinners. But how can we, flawed human beings that we

are, know who is in need of compassion and who is in need of a call to action? The answer can only be that God himself will guide us with that small voice he has placed

in our hearts. This voice is terribly hard to hear, especially with the noise our culture surrounds us with. This reviewer rightly points out that Christians all too

often speak out of their own pride and frustration, rather than responding to that voice.

So what can we say about Father Horvak in “Million Dollar Baby?” Perhaps we can say that he was frustrated after years of being taunted by Frankie. Perhaps we can say

that he believed none of his words were being heeded. Perhaps we can say that he seemed uncomfortable in his role as Priest to a parish of weak faith, a role which earns

one derision both from secular and protestant culture. Perhaps we can say that he listened to the wrong voice when he spoke to Frankie that fateful day, giving him a call

rather than offering compassion. And perhaps we can say that this slip was all too human.

Note, however, that Father Horvak is pointing to the truth. Frankie does appear to regret taking Maggie’s life. Though the end is unclear, we can say that the event

seems to have destroyed Frankie’s taste for everything good in his life. He abandons his home, his business, his only friend, his quest to be reconciled with his

daughter, and who knows what else. The epilogue, attempting to find a ray of hope, points out that he may be in a diner somewhere, eating pie and finding peace.

But what kind of peace could Frankie find? After finally discovering what his heart had yearned for, a loving relationship with a spiritual daughter (Maggie), he finds

that Maggie does not value this relationship any more than his real daughter does. Maggie cannot see past her suffering and observe that her deepest longing, a loving

relationship with a spiritual father (Frankie), has been fulfilled. She clings instead to her lost dream of being a fighter. Can we not say that the message of the Cross

is that salvation comes from suffering on behalf of love? Can we not say that Maggie was a coward in refusing to embrace the love that was before her and refusing to

share her remaining days with Frankie? Can we not say that Frankie’s only path to joy was holding on to hope that Maggie might see this before she died? Can we not say

that Frankie's choice at least contributes to the tragic ending of this story by cutting off a final opportunity for redemption?

By connecting this movie to the abortion issue, this reviewer shows his understanding that "Million Dollar Baby" is connected to the great debate of our time. Pro-life

crusaders often speak words of condemnation when they should speak words of compassion. But perhaps this state of affairs has come about because their call to action has

gone unheeded for so long. Is their message false? Is an unborn child no more deserving of rights than a slave was before the American Civil War? Pro-choice advocates

have been so successful in asserting this that compassionate pro-life initiatives receive no attention. The Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant and Parenting Student Services

Act of 2005, for example, seeks to reduce the temptation to abort a pregnancy by providing support for pregnant and parenting students on college campuses. Surely this is

an effort motivated by compassion, yet it is meeting opposition on the grounds that it does not ensure enough access to abortion. When faced with such opposition,

what is a pro-life advocate to do but wag a finger?

Posted by: Richard Davis at November 18, 2005 4:20 PM

Thank you, Richard. Appreciate your considered response. Let us know if you're interested in writing regularly for Cinekklesia! (marchban@email.unc.edu)

Posted by: Paul Marchbanks at November 18, 2005 11:59 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)