By Amy Rambow
When The Fantastic Four first hit the racks in 1961, its flawed heroes -- who fought each other as often as their foes -- heralded a storytelling revolution for the superhero genre, the comic book medium, perhaps even all of US popular culture. By the time director Tim Story's Fantastic Four (2005) hit the theaters this summer, however, that ground had been covered and recovered by a string of well-wrought superhero hits, everything from the angst of Spider-Man (2002) to the fond parody of The Incredibles (2004). Faced with the grand heights its characters originally inspired, Fantastic Four collapses, curling up around its fading forty-year-old script. Luckily, while the revolution has long since passed that script by, its heart is as true as ever, and the movie wears it on its sleeve. No Oscar contender, instant classic, or cult favorite, Fantastic Four is simply, genuinely fun -- and shouldn't that be enough?
The movie sticks as closely as social and technological progress allow to the scenario familiar to generations of comic book readers. On the verge of losing funding, scientist Reed Richards (Ioan Gruffudd), his best friend Ben Grimm (Michael Chiklis), future wife Susan Storm (Jessica Alba), and her hotshot kid brother Johnny (Chris Evans) venture into space to complete an experiment that goes awry, exposing them to the cosmic rays that transform them, respectively, into the stretchable Mr. Fantastic, monstrous Thing, force-field-wielding Invisible Woman, and flaming Human Torch.
Wisely, Fantastic Four spends most of its time on the irritating, endearing quartet and their varied reactions to their powers, saving the traditional battle against embodied evil -- in this case, Dr. Doom (Julian McMahon) -- for a brief, affirming coda. After all, as every American comics fan knows, where X-Men is about tolerance, Hulk about self-control, and Spider-Man about responsibility, Fantastic Four is about family. Not the Hallmark movie, Kleenex commercial kind of family, but the button-pushing, real life kind. By genetics or cosmic rays, we are all bound to people we might or might not choose, and the movie competently finds the reassurance in watching the grumbling four pull apart and snap together over and again.
Clinging so closely to its origins in the last century leaves the movie with two dilemmas about the Thing, both of which it tries to duck. First, it must establish that the transformation renders Ben Grimm hideous. But while 1961's Invisible Girl could recoil in feminine fright at his grotesque visage, 2005's Invisible Woman will do no such thing, and instead of reinventing that moment for today, the movie exaggerates it via a ridiculous minor character. No real woman would dump her astronaut fiance without a word just because he came home a super-strong walking pile of orange rock, and the emotional shorthand embarrasses even this film. Sexual stereotypes are not what they once were. Second, Fantastic Four faced a choice about whether to include any hint of the wonderful 2002 addition of the Thing to the growing number of superheroes with concrete religious backgrounds. The Thing is Jewish, as co-creator Jack Kirby always intended, but which never appeared on the page across decades in which pop-culture kept all spirituality as generic as possible to avoid offending consumers. Religious stereotypes are also not what they once were, I would hope, and yet the movie disappointingly makes no gesture in that direction, failing sadly to seize its easy opportunity to suggest the normality of faith in general and Jewish faith in particular. Considering that X2: X-Men United (2003) offers an openly Catholic Nightcrawler, I'm tempted to conclude that Fantastic Four is either cavalier or cowardly by comparison.
But again, while the story could have offered more, surely the fun it provides is enough to justify its space on the screen. Conventional but vigorous, enthusiastic, and sometimes even cheeky, the adventure and relationships are fully sufficient to support a summer popcorn flick. Fantastic Four is disappointing only because the scale is now set by giants -- and those giant superhero stories took their first steps on the shoulders of the original tale of the Fantastic Four.
Posted by Amy Rambow at August 30, 2005 7:09 PM
I'm impressed by a woman who knows so much about comic lore. Indeed, sexual stereotypes are not what they once were.
Posted by: Bill Stevenson at September 1, 2005 12:14 AM
Some of the most intelligent comic book fans I know are women: Amy Rambow, Heather Epes, Shelley Wunder Smith--just to name a few products of the UNC English grad department.
And comic books sure aren't for kids anymore, are they? Everyone should do thsemselves a favor sometime and pick on up . . .
Posted by: Paul Marchbanks at September 1, 2005 10:36 PM
Haven't seen the movie myself, but for those willing to dive into comic books, now's a perfect time to pick up the Fantastic Four. Michael J. Straczynski is now writing the title--same guy who has made The Amazing Spider-Man a must-read the last 3-4 years . . .
Posted by: Paul Marchbanks at September 2, 2005 9:35 AM
Amusing comment string, knowing Amy as I do.
Amy, I have to give you snaps for what may be the most useful handle on four comic titles I've ever heard: You modeled Pope's notion of true wit:
After all, as every American comics fan knowswhere X-Men is about tolerance, Hulk about self-control, and Spider-Man about responsibility, Fantastic Four is about family.Dear friend, maybe we do know it, down deep, but those words say "what oft was thought but ne'er so well expressed."
So good to read your powerful prose again.
Posted by: Randall Smith at March 30, 2006 5:01 PM